environment

South Dakota uranium project clears environmental review

The NRC says the Dewey-Burdock site in Custer and Fall River counties does not need a full environmental impact statement as it weighs a 20-year license renewal. The agency also issued a separate historic-preservation agreement.

2 min read·340 words·View source
South Dakota uranium project clears environmental review
1 / 3
Photo by Sam McCool on Pexels

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering whether to renew Powertech USA's license for the Dewey-Burdock in situ uranium recovery project for another 20 years. Its environmental assessment says the proposal would not significantly affect the environment.

  • Powertech’s Dewey-Burdock project is under review for a 20-year license renewal.
  • The NRC issued an environmental assessment and found no significant impact.
  • Dewey-Burdock produces yellowcake, which is used for commercial reactor fuel.
  • The project sits in Custer and Fall River counties, South Dakota.
  • The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering whether to renew source and byproduct materials license SUA-1600 for Powertech USA’s Dewey-Burdock in situ uranium recovery project in Custer and Fall River counties, South Dakota

The is weighing whether to renew ’s license for the Dewey-Burdock uranium recovery project in Custer and Fall River counties, . Its environmental assessment says the project would not significantly affect the environment, and a renewal would extend the permit 20 years.

The project uses in situ recovery, or , to pull uranium from the ore body and turn it into yellowcake, the uranium oxide product used to make fuel for commercially operated nuclear power reactors. That makes Dewey-Burdock part of the nuclear fuel chain, not just a local mining project.

From ore body to reactor fuel

Along with the renewal review, staff are issuing an environmental assessment, a finding of no significant impact, and a . The environmental finding says staff do not see a significant environmental impact from the proposed license renewal, while the historic-preservation agreement addresses the separate cultural review that comes with the site.

The documents are available June 17, 2026. They do not by themselves grant the renewal, but they do show the agency has finished the environmental review package it will use as it weighs whether the project can keep operating for another two decades.

Sources

Synthesized from 8 verified citationsSynthesized by AI linked to original documents.

goflashCover everything