Civil liability / product liability
Stone slab makers win shield from misuse lawsuits
Sen. Ashley Moody’s bill would block civil cases against stone slab manufacturers and sellers when someone else’s misuse caused the harm. It also covers requests for injunctions and other court relief.
A Senate bill from Sen. Ashley Moody would shield stone slab manufacturers and sellers from certain lawsuits when the damage came from someone else’s misuse. It would also bar injunctions and other relief, narrowing one route into court for injured people and property owners.
- The bill targets misuse, not ordinary product use.
- Manufacturers and sellers would get the protection.
- It would block damages, injunctions and other relief.
- The measure is narrowly written, not a full rewrite of product-liability law.
- In the federal Senate, a bill from Florida Republican Sen
In the federal Senate, a bill from Florida Republican Sen. Ashley Moody would try to wall off manufacturers and sellers of stone slab products from lawsuits when the real problem came from someone else’s misuse. It would bar civil liability actions for damages, injunctive relief or other relief tied to that kind of misuse.
That matters because it cuts off one route into court before a case can get much traction. The proposal is narrow. It does not rewrite product-liability law across the board, only the disputes that turn on misuse by other people.
Who the bill would protect
The shield is written for manufacturers and sellers, which puts the focus upstream in the supply chain. The companies that made the slab or sold it would be the ones protected, not the person whose handling or use allegedly caused the harm.
That distinction is the heart of the bill. Cases like this often turn on control, notice and whether the problem came from the product itself or from the way it was used. Moody’s measure draws its line on the misuse side of that divide.
What gets shut off in court
The title does not stop at cash claims. It also covers injunctive relief and other relief, so the bill is designed to reach court orders as well as damages if the claim stems from misuse by others. That gives the proposal a broader practical reach inside a single dispute, even while its scope stays limited to one trigger.
For consumers, contractors and others who work around these materials, the change would narrow the leverage plaintiffs can bring into court. For the covered companies, it would mean less exposure when the fight is really about someone else’s bad use rather than the way the product was sold.