Qualified Natural Gas Project
HB 381 would strip local gas-project property taxes in Alaska
HB 381 would block local governments from taxing qualified natural gas project property under the new section. It also says revenue tied to that project does not count as a local school contribution.

In Alaska, the bill would steer qualifying gas-project property and related revenue out of both school-funding calculations and municipal tax counts. HB 381 is still active and is now headed to the next chamber for consideration.
- Qualifying gas-project property would be left out of Alaska school-funding value counts.
- Related municipal revenue would not count as a local school contribution.
- Cities and boroughs could not levy the new tax on qualified property.
- The bill links school formulas, municipal taxes, and the gas-project tax structure.
In Alaska, HB 381 would change how a qualifying natural gas project is counted in school and municipal tax formulas. The bill would keep that property out of the full and true value base used in the school-funding formula, and it would also keep certain project revenue from counting as a local contribution.
The practical effect is that the project would not make a community look wealthier for school-funding purposes just because the property is there. It would also change how municipalities account for money tied to the project.
Schools and the property tax base
The bill’s school-funding language turns on a simple idea. Alaska uses local property value as part of the formula that helps measure what a district can contribute on its own. HB 381 would say that the full and true value of taxable real and personal property does not include qualified property tied to the gas project.
That matters in places that host major energy infrastructure. If the property is left out of the count, it would not lift the local property base used in the school formula. In other words, the project would be treated differently from ordinary taxable property when officials calculate local support for schools.
What cities and boroughs could count
HB 381 would also narrow what municipalities may treat as local contribution. The bill says local contribution does not include revenue a municipality receives under the gas-project revenue section. It also says any calculation under that section must leave out the amount of the tax levied under the new gas-tax provision.
On top of that, the bill would bar municipalities from levying that tax on qualified property. That would limit local governments’ ability to use the project itself as part of their tax base under the new rules.
A broader change to the gas-project tax setup
The proposal sits inside a larger rewrite of how Alaska handles certain natural gas project property and related facilities. It ties together property taxes, school contributions, municipal tax rules, and a new volumetric tax on natural gas throughput.
For residents and local governments, the main issue is how much of the project gets counted in public finance formulas. HB 381 would move some of that value and revenue out of the calculations that help shape school funding and municipal taxing room.