Let Courts Limit
Ohio animal-abuse convictions could trigger pet bans
The bill would add mandatory fines and let courts limit who can own, keep or live with a companion animal after a conviction. Counties could also create a public list to help shelters screen adopters.
Ohio lawmakers are weighing tougher penalties for animal abuse. The proposal adds mandatory fines, expands the law to cover abuse of a companion-animal corpse and lets courts bar some offenders from having companion animals.
- Mandatory fines would be added to animal-abuse convictions.
- Some offenders could be barred from owning or living with a companion animal.
- The bill also covers abuse of a companion-animal corpse.
- Counties could create a public Do Not Adopt registry.
- In Ohio, a conviction for animal abuse could carry more than a fine and a criminal record
In Ohio, a conviction for animal abuse could carry more than a fine and a criminal record. A proposal in the General Assembly would add mandatory fines, cover abuse of a companion animal corpse and let courts bar some offenders from owning, possessing or living with a companion animal, the legal term for a pet.
That matters because the punishment would not stop at the courthouse. For people convicted under the tougher rules, the law would also reach into the home and into the question of whether they can keep an animal again.
A tougher penalty, not just a new definition
The bill amends Ohio Revised Code sections 959.99 and 955.56. It would turn animal abuse into a category with built-in punishment, including mandatory fines for violations of an animal-abuse offense.
For felony animal-abuse offenses committed on or after the effective date, the bill would bar a person from knowingly owning, possessing, having custody of or residing in a residence with any companion animal. For misdemeanor cases, that restriction would last two years, beginning when the person is released from incarceration, or when the conviction or plea happens if there is no jail time.
A county board of commissioners could also create a public “Do Not Adopt” registry for people covered by that two-year ban, giving shelters and animal-control workers another way to track who should not be taking home a pet.
The law also reaches what is left behind
The proposal goes further by prohibiting abuse of a companion animal corpse. That closes off conduct that can fall through the cracks when cruelty laws focus only on living animals.
Available key vote records show the bill advanced without recorded no votes.