labor
Ohio health workers could keep shifts without a noncompete
Senator Susan Manchester’s bill would also stop platform fees when a worker takes a job at a health care facility. It narrows how these app-booked shifts are treated under some Ohio labor laws.
Some Ohio health care workers who pick up shifts through platforms would be treated differently under a bill from Senator Susan Manchester. The proposal also bars noncompete clauses and fees when a worker moves into a facility job.
- Some platform-booked health workers would fall outside employee rules for certain laws.
- The bill reaches overtime definitions in Ohio’s Revised Code.
- Platforms could not require noncompetes.
- Platforms could not charge a fee if a worker takes a facility job.
- Recorded votes advanced without no votes.
In Ohio, some health care shifts booked through apps would come with a different legal label. That matters because the employee-versus-nonemployee line can shape overtime, employer duties and how much control a platform can keep over the work. Senator Susan Manchester’s proposal would say that, under certain circumstances, a health care worker is not the employee of a health care worker platform or a health care facility for purposes of specified laws.
The bill is aimed at the people who pick up short-notice work through digital platforms, the facilities that need those shifts filled and the platforms sitting between them. It narrows the rules for that slice of work instead of rewriting Ohio labor law across the board.
Where the label changes the rules
The measure reaches sections 4121.01 and 4113.87 of the Revised Code, putting overtime and related employment definitions in play. That is the practical heart of the bill. If a shift falls inside the carveout, the worker is treated differently for those laws than someone hired through a more traditional employment arrangement.
The proposal also says volunteer service does not count as employment for these purposes. That keeps the bill focused on paid platform work and the status questions that come with it.
What platforms would have to give up
The bill does not just create a narrower worker lane. It also limits what a health care worker platform can demand from the people using it. A platform could not require a noncompete agreement, and it could not require a health care worker or health care facility to pay a fee or compensation if the worker accepts an offer of employment from a facility.
That combination is the real tension in the measure: easier flexibility for platform-booked shifts, but less leverage for the platform once a worker wants to move on. The bill tries to make those jobs more mobile without giving platforms a lock on the worker’s next step.
A smooth vote record
Available vote records show the bill advanced without recorded no votes. That does not settle the policy fight, but it does show the proposal moved through its tracked votes without opposition on the record.
The bigger stake
For nurses, aides and other health care workers, the question is not just what app they use to find work. It is whether that work is treated like employment, contractor-style flexibility or something in between, with consequences for overtime and other labor rules. For facilities, the bill would shape how they can staff busy shifts without turning every booking into a full employment relationship.